Skip to main content

Summer Leftovers... Noah's Ark

Back in early July I stumbled across this article from AOL news:

It's a story about how a Creationist group in Kentucky built what they consider to be a replica of Noah's Ark.  A fascinating story, so much so that I was compelled to post some comments on our Facebook page.  In looking back at this story, I thought I should also share those thoughts here on our blog:

File this under "are you kidding me?"

Apparently a creationist group has built what they consider to be a replica of Noah's Ark in Williamstown Kentucky. They claim it was built according to Biblical dimensions (which can be found in Genesis 6:14-16).

While we do get some details as to the overall size of the ark, including that it should have 3 main decks, an upper deck, and a door on the side, we don't get much else. We're told it should be made of "gopher wood" (which scholars conclude was a poor Hebrew translation for "cypress") and that it should be covered in "pitch" inside and out... pitch of course, being a tar like substance to prevent the ark from leaking.

Aside from it's creationist roots, I have a few problems with this ark, beginning with it's modern nautical architecture. It looks like a cruise ship, with a curved bow and hydrodynamic stabilizers running along the keel. Keep in mind that during the time of Noah we have no reference whatsoever of boats or of sea-faring cultures. While there is some archeological evidence of people using rafts and canoes as far back as 8,000 BCE, we don't really see the genesis of boats as we know them today until 4,000 BCE with the ancient Egyptians.

When we hear the story of Noah's Ark (Genesis 6-9), we hear the story of the flood, and kind of jump to the conclusion that the "ark" was like a ship... a craft made to plow the waters of the flood. While the ark was intended to float above the rising waters, I don't think there was any nautical design involved. No bow, no stern, essentially a large floating box (not unlike the ark we see in the 2014 film "Noah" starring Russell Crowe). Again, this is a culture that knows nothing yet of building and using boats for transportation.

It's easy for our more modern culture to think of a boat when we think of Noah's Ark... but that perception is mistaken. When we think of a boat we're forgetting the ancient definition for the word "ark" which is a "sacred repository" or "sacred chest" meant to protect something holy. Think of "the Ark of the Covenant" holding the 10 Commandments. In this case, Noah's Ark is the sacred repository of God's creation, and is a symbol of God's covenant with man to never willfully destroy the earth again. It's not a boat, it's a sacred chest holding what God finds most dear... Noah, his family, the animals of the earth.

This "ark" in Kentucky is an interesting idea, but like so many creationist theories, there are any number of inaccuracies that can be found when tested against science and historical context. A faith based on the Bible does not preclude science or the theory of evolution.


Popular posts from this blog

3rd Sunday of Advent

The third Sunday of Advent marks the midpoint of the season… in Catholic terms, this is like “hump day”, where we happily see that the conclusion of our journey is within sight.  Referred to as Gaudete Sunday, it takes its name from the Latin word for rejoice.  We will hear this word several times throughout this Sunday's Mass in our prayers and our readings.  We light the rose colored candle on our Advent wreaths, rose being a mixture of Advent violet and Christmas white.  Not only is Christmas a joyous occasion to celebrate the birth of our Lord, but it reminds us that we are joyous (not fearful) of his return.

The Word for the 3rd Sunday of Advent Isaiah 61:1-2a, 10-11
Luke 1:46-48, 49-50, 53-54
1 Thessalonians 5:16-24
John 1:6-8, 19-28

We open with a great announcement from Third Isaiah, that the anointed brings glad tidings to the poor.  If his words sound familiar, they should.  Not only are they reminiscent to the announcement made by the angels to the shepherd in th…

4th Sunday of Lent

This Sunday we continue our Lenten journey through Salvation History with a continued focus on covenant.  We’ve already given witness to the covenants with Noah, Abraham, and Moses.  This week we turn our attention to the Davidic Covenant (the covenant with King David), or more accurately, the covenant with the monarchy of Israel.

The Word for the 4th Sunday of Lent 2 Chronicles 36:14-16, 19-23
Psalms 137:1-2, 3, 4-5, 6
Ephesians 2:4-10
John 3:14-21

Our first reading comes from the end of the 2nd book of Chronicles.  Though our intent this Sunday is to remember the Davidic Covenant, our Lectionary has chosen an interesting approach.  Rather than give us a story about King David, we are presented with a story  from the end of the Babylonian Exile.  Why approach the covenant with David from this tail-end view? 

It’s an approach that actually fits very well with the Book of Chronicles, for you see, the Book of Chronicles is much more than a retelling of the story we heard in books …

Nuns and Nones... continued...

On 6-24-2016 I wrote a brief commentary on what we call the "nones"... that is, those people who check the box that says "none" when asked about their religious affiliation.  That commentary was based on an address by my former high school's principal at their 2016 graduation address.  But this topic of the "nones" returned to my attention with this article posted on our daily Angelus News email from the e-magazine Crux:

Notre Dame debuts digital platform to reach young Catholics, ‘nones’
Please take a moment to read it... 

Of particular interest is the increasing number of "nones," those people who claim no religious affiliation. I first heard this term a few years back from one of the speakers at our LA Religious Education Congress. The term itself grew out of a 2012 Pew Research study that showed this rising trend. Working as I do with the RCIA and Adult Faith Formation, this was a known issue, but the Pew study validated what ma…